On it is irresponsible to unilaterally withdraw from multilateral

On the other hand, America’s withdrawal
from the TPP has greatly reduced its economic and political influence in the
Asia Pacific region. The strength of the state is a decisive factor in
international relations, and this principle will not be changed. But after the
withdrawal of the East Asian and Southeast Asian countries after the withdrawal
of the US, there was no time to deal with it. Although the United States is
strong, it is irresponsible to unilaterally withdraw from multilateral
agreements. The loss of the image of the state is only one aspect, and more
importantly, China has gained a greater and more free space for development in
the region. At present, China has signed FTA (free trade agreement) with ASEAN,
Chile, Pakistan, New Zealand, Singapore, Peru, Costa Rica, Iceland,
Switzerland, Korea and Australia. Four of the six ASEAN countries, New Zealand,
Singapore, Peru, South Korea and Australia are all TPP members. At the same
time, China also took part in and lived in the RCEP (regional comprehensive
economic partnership) initiated by the ten ASEAN countries, which was opposite
to the TPP. RCEP’s withdrawal in the United States has made the TPP agreement
close to the background of abortion. This means that China is developing
steadily in geopolitics and politics, and has an advantage in the competition
with the United States and East Asia or Southeast Asia (let alone East Asia and
Korea). Although Japan is in a new round of dialogue performance in the hope of
leading TPP wishes, but Canada refused to attend expressed negative attitudes,
the TPP agreement has just started but it is very difficult to have a spent
force, optimistic prospect.  

From an economic point of view, the
withdrawal of TPP is conducive to the domestic economic development of the
United States in the short term. We understand that the US led TPP has
eliminated barriers to trade and investment in the region, which can easily
lead to the outflow of a large number of private enterprises. In recent years,
the manufacturing enterprises in the United States are looking at the cheap
labor force in Mexico, pouring into the Mexico in large numbers, opening
factories in the locals, and even directly moving their headquarters to Mexico,
thus saving a lot of production costs and making great profits. But this has
led to the loss of the economic vitality of the United States — a large number
of enterprises leave the us to set up factories, and at the same time, a large
number of employment opportunities flow out of the US, increasing the
employment pressure of the US itself. In Trump’s ruling idea, there is a clear
color of trade protection. Since taking office he implemented a number of
measures, including tax provisions, strictly control the import of currency
manipulation (Section 201 and Section 337), to protect domestic enterprises,
all with “America first” principle, the international relations in
the “national interest first” principle reflected most vividly.
Therefore, in the short term, the economic vitality of the United States will
have an obvious recovery trend, but the long-term implementation of trade
protectionism is bound to have a huge impact on the US’s international trade,
thus giving negative feedback to the overall economy of the United States. The
world is going global. In the process of global production, all countries need
to measure their own advantages, make full use of their advantages, produce and
exchange them, so as to achieve the most efficient production. The closed
economic model is difficult to maintain the survival of a superpower such as
the United States, not to mention its international status and influence. But
it is just a moment that the United States is bound to introduce new policies
to change its protection in the field of import and export.          

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

While the United States has reached its
political goals, the TPP members benefit from each other. Mexico, Vietnam and
other developing countries have low labor force and well-developed
manufacturing industry. Their labor strength can attract large numbers of
companies to set up factories in China and create employment and economic
income. At the same time, less trade barriers have greatly widened the export
market of products, and even “Vietnam made” will replace the
“made in China” as the world’s favorite products. Relatively,
developed countries such as Japan and Canada have better overseas investment
opportunities and choices under the pressure of trade in China. They can make
efficient use of resources for production and trade activities.                

TPP ultimately seeks free trade – the free
flow of zero tariffs, goods and services in the 12 members, and the unified
standard of all economic regulatory systems. TPP segments have free trade and
services, currency convertibility, tax equity, privatization of state-owned
enterprises, the protection of labor rights, the protection of intellectual
property rights, protect the environment resources, freedom of information,
namely the 12 country banned the establishment of various threshold, subsidies
and protectionism is not conducive to free trade measures. In the context of
economic globalization, the combination of production and import and export
trade in various countries has contributed to the stability and prosperity of
the country. After the launch of TPP in the Asia Pacific region, decreasing the
cost of trade between 12 countries; however, China has import and export tax,
the policy for the protection of domestic Chinese has become a huge
international trade barriers, to control the level of international trade
Chinese, a suppression in the Asia Pacific region China.           

To achieve this goal, the US led TPP
agreement advocates eliminating trade barriers and promoting the construction
of free trade area. There are two important contents, namely, free convertibility
of currencies and privatization of state-owned enterprises. However, the
internationalization of China’s RMB has just started. Liberalization of
currency and convertibility will lead to great turbulence in China’s economy
and massive outflows of capital, which will affect the stability and
reliability of RMB. Privatization of state-owned enterprises is a process of
transferring power from state to company. China has strictly controlled the
industry related to people’s livelihood. The reality of large scale and high
income of state-owned enterprises also means that China cannot follow this
rule. At the same time, the TPP agreement’s standards for environmental
protection, labor rights and intellectual property rights are also very high.
It is difficult for China to achieve these indicators and is deliberately
excluded.

TPP is widely known as “the economy of
NATO, in the international social environment more peaceful and open age group,
it is relatively strong, the strong political meaning, aims to establish a
trade cooperation in Asia Pacific region, and Chinese excluded, putting
enormous pressure on foreign trade Chinese.