Moreover, to treat epilepsy for the control of seizures.

Moreover, there are no Concluding all this information treatments and solutions made using 3D printing technology in the medical field gives us many great advantages compared to traditional types of treatment, but with this technology evolving too fast there could be difficulties and even danger of adapting them for fair and safe public use.  Ever since the advent of 3D printers, its safety has been a topic of discussion and consideration across the board. The 3D printer is not only being used is the medical field, but also in construction industries, for automobile parts, fast food industry even in the textile industry. Having said this, there is one commerce, that raises more concern than others the pharmaceutical industry. The use of 3D printer for production of drugs has created somewhat of a havoc among the legal community and pharmaceutical executives (Markarian, 2016). The first 3D printed drug was approved by the FDA in 2015 and that’s when its potential in this field was recognized. It is a pill used to treat epilepsy for the control of seizures. Since it was a new process of production, it was easier to consume (Kite-Powell, 2016). However, every advancement does come with its own set of drawbacks. For instance, there was a huge risk concerning product liability. Easy access and availability of the drug’s configurations to various pharmacies and health care providers could not possibly ensure proper quality control. (Rolles, 2009) The pharmaceutical company would not be able to regulate and supervise every 3D printing operation. Providing the drug blueprint to a third party is a huge responsibility. It would have to bear accountability in case of an unwanted incident or defect claim (Rolles, 2009). Acquiring insurance would be vital to pharmaceutical companies to ensure that they are legally protected. One of the major concerns of the pharma industry is production of fake medicines since 3D printers are accessible to hackers and cyber manipulation as compared to manual manufacturing (Kan, 2018). This could be a potential health hazard for consumers and patients. There is no way of knowing the extent a hacker may go to alter the formula of a drug. The 3D printer is a machine after all, however precise it may be there will always be a chance of error. The slightest defect in the printer could cause manufacturing malfunction of large proportions. As most technology influences the environment in some way, the 3D printer is no exception. According to a recent study published Environmental Science and Technology Journal, researchers found fumes and ultra-fine particles emitted from the printer (Millsaps, 2016). These particles could be hazardous to one’s health on continuous exposure over a long period of time. Exposure to such products in a small working environment warrants use with caution. Certain filament fumes are carcinogenic in nature and they have the potential to cause cancer and inhalation of such fumes can be toxic. Again, the research process is still ongoing and new discoveries are being made every day. In conclusion this is ground-breaking invention which has truly revolutionized the era of modern technology. The fact that it is being used in biology and saving the lives of so many is truly a feat. What once was thought as impossible is now possible due to this remarkable development. New technologies may have their drawbacks, but they are constantly being worked and deliberated upon and tweaked to improve them. Compared to the monumental success the 3D printer has achieved in the past couple of years, its failures are dampened and are only seen as minor glitches in the way that can be fixed. Mistakes are to be learned from and they are not meant to anchor down and come in the way of success. The future of 3D printers is very bright and nothing but optimistic.